| Title |
Increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy by more frequent administration or sequential scheduling: a patient-level meta-analysis of 37 298 women with early breast cancer in 26 randomised trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)33137-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Gray, Rosie Bradley, Jeremy Braybrooke, Zulian Liu, Richard Peto, Lucy Davies, David Dodwell, Paul McGale, Hongchao Pan, Carolyn Taylor, William Barlow, Judith Bliss, Paolo Bruzzi, David Cameron, George Fountzilas, Sibylle Loibl, John Mackey, Miguel Martin, Lucia Del Mastro, Volker Möbus, Valentina Nekljudova, Sabino De Placido, Sandra Swain, Michael Untch, Kathleen I Pritchard, Jonas Bergh, Larry Norton, Clare Boddington, Julie Burrett, Mike Clarke, Christina Davies, Fran Duane, Vaughan Evans, Lucy Gettins, Jon Godwin, Robert Hills, Sam James, Hui Liu, Elizabeth MacKinnon, Gurdeep Mannu, Theresa McHugh, Philip Morris, Simon Read, Yaochen Wang, Zhe Wang, Peter Fasching, Nadia Harbeck, Pascal Piedbois, Michael Gnant, Guenther Steger, Angelo Di Leo, Stella Dolci, Prue Francis, Denis Larsimont, Jean Marie Nogaret, Catherine Philippson, Martine Piccart, Sabine Linn, Petronella Peer, Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen, Sonja Vliek, John Mackey, Dennis Slamon, John Bartlett, Vivien H Bramwell, Bingshu Chen, Stephen Chia, Karen Gelmon, Paul Goss, Mark Levine, Wendy Parulekar, Joseph Pater, Eileen Rakovitch, Lois Shepherd, Dongsheng Tu, Tim Whelan, Don Berry, Gloria Broadwater, Constance Cirrincione, Hyman Muss, Raymond Weiss, Yi Shan, Yong Fu Shao, Xiang Wang, Binghe Xu, Dong-Bing Zhao, Harry Bartelink, Nina Bijker, Jan Bogaerts, Fatima Cardoso, Tanja Cufer, Jean-Pierre Julien, Philip Poortmans, Emiel Rutgers, Cornelis van de Velde, Eva Carrasco, Miguel Angel Segui, Jens Uwe Blohmer, Serban Costa, Bernd Gerber, Christian Jackisch, Gunter von Minckwitz, Mario Giuliano, Michele De Laurentiis, Christina Bamia, Georgia-Angeliki Koliou, Dimitris Mavroudis, Roger A'Hern, Paul Ellis, Lucy Kilburn, James Morden, John Yarnold, Mohammad Sadoon, Augustinus H Tulusan, Stewart Anderson, Gordon Bass, Joe Costantino, James Dignam, Bernard Fisher, Charles Geyer, Eleftherios P Mamounas, Soon Paik, Carol Redmond, D Lawrence Wickerham, Marco Venturini, Claudia Bighin, Simona Pastorino, Paolo Pronzato, Mario Roberto Sertoli, Theodorus Foukakis, Kathy Albain, Rodrigo Arriagada, Elizabeth Bergsten Nordström, Francesco Boccardo, Etienne Brain, Lisa Carey, Alan Coates, Robert Coleman, Candace Correa, Jack Cuzick, Nancy Davidson, Mitch Dowsett, Marianne Ewertz, John Forbes, Richard Gelber, Aron Goldhirsch, Pamela Goodwin, Daniel Hayes, Catherine Hill, James Ingle, Reshma Jagsi, Wolfgang Janni, Hirofumi Mukai, Yasuo Ohashi, Lori Pierce, Vinod Raina, Peter Ravdin, Daniel Rea, Meredith Regan, John Robertson, Joseph Sparano, Andrew Tutt, Giuseppe Viale, Nicholas Wilcken, Norman Wolmark, Wiliam Wood, Milvia Zambetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 11% |
| United States | 8 | 10% |
| Japan | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| Mexico | 4 | 5% |
| Belgium | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 64% |
| Scientists | 14 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 322 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 42 | 13% |
| Researcher | 39 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 20% |
| Unknown | 103 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Unknown | 121 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 787. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#24,531
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#598
of 42,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#475
of 450,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#11
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.